Skip to content
Adams
Pharmaceutical ManufacturingIndustrial AutomationCase study · March 10, 2025 · 8 min read

A two-cobot machine-tending cell for a sterile pharma fill-finish line that needed to free four operators

Headline result−3 FTEoperators redeployed per shift
Pharmaceutical fill finish line with isolators
Pharmaceutical fill finish line with isolators
Customer profile

A contract development and manufacturing organization (CDMO) operating a 60,000 sq ft sterile fill-finish facility in central Florida. Two ISO 5 isolators feeding a downstream packaging line, GMP-validated, FDA-inspected annually.

Capability

Industrial Automation

Partner brands

Universal Robots · Robotiq · Banner · Schmalz · Allen-Bradley

01

The problem

The customer was facing a chronic skilled-operator shortage in a labor market where every nearby pharma site was bidding for the same people. Their downstream secondary packaging operation required four senior operators per shift to feed empty trays into a tray-erector and load filled vials into a cartoner, both at 120 trays per minute. Turnover was running 22% annually on those positions, and every backfill required 90 days to validate to GMP standards.

Their corporate sister sites had standardized on hard-guarded industrial robots, but the customer's existing footprint and mezzanine geometry made conventional robot installations impractical. They also needed a solution that could be reconfigured for new SKUs without re-running a full risk assessment.

Adams treated our quality team as a primary stakeholder, not as a hurdle. That's why we went back to them for line two.
Director of engineering, sterile fill-finish CDMO
02

What we did

We specified a two-cobot cell using two UR16e cobots — one feeding the tray-erector, one loading the cartoner — with Robotiq AirPick vacuum end-effectors and Banner safety scanners for area-presence detection. Both cobots run from a shared HMI on a Rockwell PLC, with recipe-driven SKU changeover that the line operators can trigger themselves without engineering involvement.

We worked with the customer's quality team for 12 weeks pre-install on the GMP validation package: IQ/OQ/PQ protocols, cleaning validation for the cobot end-effectors, cybersecurity hardening of the cell network, and reconfigurability documentation that holds up under FDA scrutiny. We trained both shifts on the cell and left an Adams field engineer on-site for the first two weeks of production.

03

The result

The cell freed three of the four secondary-packaging operators for higher-skill work elsewhere in the facility. SKU changeover dropped from a four-hour validated procedure to a 25-minute recipe load. The customer has since extended the cell to a second line and invited Adams to bid on a fill-line tending project at their corporate site in Indiana.

−3 FTE
operators redeployed per shift
25 min
SKU changeover (was 4 hr)
12 wk
GMP validation cycle
04

Components used

  • UR16e cobots (qty 2) Universal Robots
  • AirPick vacuum end-effectors Robotiq
  • Safety laser scanners Banner
  • Schmalz vacuum pump assembly Schmalz
  • Allen-Bradley CompactLogix PLC integration Allen-Bradley
  • GMP IQ/OQ/PQ documentation package (Adams-developed)

Other recent work

All case studies →
Get on the schedule

Have a problem on a line right now?

Tell us where it hurts. A senior application engineer will respond within one business day — same-day for true downtime emergencies.

On-site responseSame day in the Tampa Bay area
Average audit2 days on the floor · 10-day report
Engineering staff27 application & field engineers
LanguagesEnglish & Spanish, in-territory