Skip to content
Adams
PhosphateFluid PowerCase study · November 8, 2024 · 6 min read

How a phosphate processor cut $120k a year in compressed-air losses without buying a single new compressor

Headline result$120kannual electricity savings
Industrial chemical processing plant exterior with stacks at dusk
Industrial chemical processing plant exterior with stacks at dusk
Customer profile

A 40,000 sq ft phosphate processing plant near Lakeland, Florida. Three reactor trains, continuous 24/6 operation, one of the largest single consumers of compressed air on the customer's site map.

Capability

Fluid Power

Partner brands

MAC Valves · Camozzi · Festo

01

The problem

Plant engineering had been running the rotary-screw compressor house at 98% load for the better part of two years. The reliability team was watching loaded-hour curves climb, two of the four 200 hp units were lined up for top-end overhauls, and the capital request for a fifth compressor was already drafted at $340,000 plus install. Then a control-system upgrade flagged the obvious next step: get an independent set of eyes on the air side before adding capacity.

We brought a two-person crew on-site for a 48-hour ultrasonic leak survey across the entire phosphate train — feed, react, granulate, screen, bag. Findings: 187 distinct compressed-air leaks, weighted by orifice size and dwell. Combined leak load measured at the equivalent of 142 SCFM, or about 38% of the rated output of one of the four compressors. Roughly $9,800 a month at the customer's blended electrical rate.

We came in expecting to size a fifth compressor. We left with a $340,000 capital line item we don't need to spend.
Plant reliability manager, phosphate processing
02

What we did

Rather than dump the survey on the maintenance team and walk away, we ranked every leak by ease (tag-and-replace vs. rebuild) and dollars-per-hour (size + duty cycle). The top 30 leaks alone accounted for 71% of the total loss. We supplied the replacement push-to-connect fittings, FRL kits, and quick-disconnects directly from MAC, Camozzi, and Festo stock and rode along for the first two days of the patch campaign so the night-shift millwrights could see the technique.

Phase two: replaced 14 worn-out poppet valves on the bagger line with MAC 92-series pulse valves and rebuilt three filter-regulator-lubricator stations near the granulator. We also tagged 23 lower-priority leaks for the next planned outage. Total parts and labor for phase one and two came in at $61,000.

03

The result

Six weeks after the patch campaign, ultrasonic resurvey measured leak load at 19 SCFM — an 87% reduction. The plant pulled one of the 200 hp compressors offline and put it on standby; the capital request for the fifth compressor was withdrawn. Verified annualized savings: $118,400 in electricity and $14,000 in deferred compressor maintenance. ROI on the engagement: 4.7 months.

$120k
annual electricity savings
87%
leak load reduction
4.7 mo
ROI payback
04

Components used

  • 92-series pulse valves MAC Valves
  • Push-to-connect fittings, polyurethane tubing Camozzi
  • FRL combo units Festo
  • Ultrasonic leak detection (UE Systems)

Other recent work

All case studies →
Get on the schedule

Have a problem on a line right now?

Tell us where it hurts. A senior application engineer will respond within one business day — same-day for true downtime emergencies.

On-site responseSame day in the Tampa Bay area
Average audit2 days on the floor · 10-day report
Engineering staff27 application & field engineers
LanguagesEnglish & Spanish, in-territory